King Rat (gkr) wrote,
King Rat

Eco 200: insulation

(individual) Should we have laws that require homeowners to insulate in order to save energy?

  1. How will homeowners benefit from improved insulation? Should homeowners insulate if the cost to themselves of doing so exceeds the benefits to themselves?

    They will pay less in heating costs. And generally homeowners should not insulate if the cost to themselves exceeds the benefits.

  2. How do others in a community benefit from the decision of some to insulate and thereby reduce their consumption of energy? Do these spillover benefits justify a subsidy to encourage homeowners to insulate? Who would lobby for such a subsidy?

    Three possible benefits I can think of quickly. One is preventing blackouts when overall use reaches certain thresholds, increasing the cost to all consumers by exorbitant amounts. Another is preventing the use of emergency services due to extreme heat and cold, costs of which or more often born by local governments (and thus, the taxpayers of the community). Reducing overall energy use can also decrease fossil fuel emissions by power generators, reducing pollution. These spillover benefits might justify some subsidy. It depends on how much those benefits actually are worth.

Tags: school

  • Genealogy and Family History: Class #2

    A gave myself a couple of tasks to accomplish yesterday before the second session of my genealogy class. The first was to pick up the class packet…

  • Macro-economics

    I just signed up for Macro-Economics at Seattle Central. With Hubert, the same instructor I had for Micro-Economics. It's online. Class starts…

  • Eco 200: grade

    I just checked my grade for for my micro-economics class: 4.0. I'm assuming that means I got an A. Also, I now have a 4.0 G.P.A. at Seattle…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened