King Rat (gkr) wrote,
King Rat
gkr

Eco 200: parks & libraries

(group) A frequent argument in support of government-produced goods is that they are vital to social welfare and therefore their provision cannot safely be left to the whims of the marketplace. Does this explain why parks and libraries are usually municipal services, whereas food and medical care are usually secured through the market? Can you suggest a better explanation to account for these cases?

It's hard to prevent the free rider problem in the case of parks. Keeping non-payers out might ruin the experience of the payers. And then no one would pay. Access to libraries can be more tightly controlled (because they are indoors), so this might be more of a case ofpandering to voters desire for a free lunch than anything else.

Subscribe

  • Last post

    I don't plan to delete my LJ (I paid for permanent status, dammit), but this will be the last post. I don't plan to read it anymore, either…

  • Unemployed

    Turns out my insurance is cut off at midnight tonight, not the end of the month. In a way, that's a good thing. Now I'll move my appointment…

  • Home from the cruise, off to Sunnyvale

    A week off, but tomorrow I head to the home office for a week there.

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

  • 0 comments